# Specification Quality Checklist: KernelSU-Next on sunfish (LAB)

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before planning  
**Created**: 2026-09-15  
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- Product names required by constitution (KernelSU-Next, SusFS, Magisk-as-non-default,
  TrickyStore-class *experiment*) appear as **capability choices**, not code design.
- Checklist item “non-technical stakeholders”: banking PASS/FAIL and LAB-only
  constraints are written for the owner; kernel revision pinning is an audit need.
- SC-002 “≥95% checklist rows” assumes a concrete verification checklist in
  `/speckit-plan` / tasks — acceptable at specify stage.
- Ready for `/speckit-plan`. **Yuh PASS is a hard-gate** (owner 2026-09-15):
  without it, root is not justified vs NeoBackup + native call-rec / FLAG_SECURE.