# Specification Quality Checklist: Restricted native signature spoofing

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning  
**Created**: 2026-09-15  
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- Oracle path and package names appear as acceptance identifiers (required for
  LAB/GOLDEN verification); patch file paths belong in `/speckit-plan`, not here.
- Checklist validated 2026-09-15 after initial draft — ready for `/speckit-plan`.
- Spec updated same day with **First working stack** (US6, FR-010/011, SC-007/008):
  folds `004` packaging leftovers + BeaconDB location into this phase; keeps
  `006`/`007` out. Re-validated for plan. Plan artifacts generated 2026-09-15.