Files
AXP-Resurection/docs/hardening-backlog.md
T
sunfish-admin 12d2179c20 AXP Magisk resurrection track: Speckit 009 port AXP/LOS22 to LOS23.
Ship Magisk like GOLDEN; KernelSU optional recycle only; parallel to sunfish-a16-rom standby.
2026-09-16 21:56:22 +00:00

5.7 KiB

Hardening backlog (non-normative)

Candidate hardening ideas for later evaluation. Not requirements until a row is promoted into an active feature spec.md (012 / 013 or related).

Authority order for an active feature:

  1. Constitution
  2. That feature's spec.md
  3. This backlog / docs/axp-pro-parity.md (hints only)

Status: candidate | investigate | accepted→spec | rejected | los-provides

Privacy / identifiers

Idea Notes Status
SUPL IMSI/MSISDN exposure Reduce carrier ID leakage via SUPL candidate
Build.SERIAL restrictions Identifier privacy candidate
Analytics / statistics removal Drop unused telemetry candidate
Package query visibility Tighten package visibility candidate
MAC / address privacy Wi-Fi/BT randomization policy candidate
Private DNS defaults Sensible defaults without breaking banks candidate
CA-store review Trust anchors audit candidate

Userspace

Idea Notes Status
hardened_malloc Graphene/AXP portability on sunfish candidate
Bionic hardening Selective, attributable candidate
JNI protections Safer JNI boundaries candidate
Stack canaries Confirm / strengthen where applicable candidate
ptrace / Yama Restrict debugging attach candidate
seccomp Incremental filter improvements candidate
noexec / nosuid / nodev mounts Where applicable without breaking HW candidate
Dynamic code / JIT restrictions Evaluate app compatibility cost candidate
Exec spawning / ASLR-related Attack-surface reduction candidate

Kernel

Idea Notes Status
Historical GrapheneOS sunfish kernel patches/config Device-specific commits and config known to have run on sunfish — not CONFIG-only review candidate
Modern GrapheneOS kernel techniques Evaluate equivalent/backport on sunfish 4.14; no blind cherry-picks candidate
AXP/DivestOS sunfish kernel patch audit Identify AXP-owned vs inherited vs upstream; de-duplicate against LOS candidate
Applicable CVE backports Document EOL firmware vs patchable kernel candidate
CFI Feasibility on 4.14 candidate
ASLR config Kernel/userspace related knobs candidate
IPv6 privacy Address generation / exposure candidate
Debug / UART restrictions Reduce attack surface candidate
Attack-surface reduction Drop unused drivers/configs carefully candidate

Kernel hardening source policy

The kernel base remains the LineageOS 23.2-compatible sunfish kernel.

                         ┌─ historical GOS sunfish
                         │
LOS23/A16 sunfish 4.14 ←─┼─ AXP own + DivestOS
      OUR BASE           │
                         ├─ modern GOS techniques
                         │
                         └─ original upstream fixes

Not: GrapheneOS Android 13 (or any old GrapheneOS) kernel tree as our base.

Candidate hardening comes from four classes:

  1. Historical GrapheneOS sunfish — device-specific patches/configuration known to have run on sunfish (real commits, not only .config).
  2. AXP.OS / DivestOS sunfish — audit the actual patch stack; distinguish AXP-owned changes from inherited changes.
  3. Modern GrapheneOS — use current kernel hardening as a source of techniques/security properties; adapt/backport only where feasible on non-GKI Linux 4.14; do not assume current Pixel kernel patches cherry-pick cleanly.
  4. Original upstream — where a GrapheneOS/AXP/Divest patch derives from AOSP, Android common, Linux stable, or another upstream source, prefer the appropriate original upstream fix when practical.

For each candidate record:

  • security problem / property;
  • original source and commit;
  • source lineage / provenance;
  • sunfish-specific or generic;
  • already present in LOS 23.2?;
  • already present through another patch?;
  • kernel/hardware prerequisites;
  • applicability to Linux 4.14;
  • port/backport required;
  • compatibility/regression risk;
  • test result;
  • final decision.

Much later / evaluate

Idea Notes Status
Per-app network control High UX/complexity candidate
Sensors permission model Graphene-like candidate
Storage Scopes-like behaviour Compatibility cost candidate
Contact Scopes-like behaviour Compatibility cost candidate
Duress PIN/password Later candidate
USB restrictions Policy toggles candidate
Exploit-protection toggles User-facing switches candidate
Modernize LOS API deprecations / Kotlin annotation targets Final-ROM hygiene (last steps), not a mid-feature gate. Measured on 005 bacon 2026-09-15 SUCCESS (~45k log lines): ~3k deprecated, ~4.5k KT-73255 annotation-target, ~8.7k “warning” hits total; 0 hard error:/FAILED: in successful run. Themes: Settings Slices [removal]; SystemUI KeyguardState/SceneContainer/CommunalScenes; DesktopMode desk APIs; FingerprintManager/Executors; SettingsLib @StringRes KT-73255. Fix API-by-API with attributable ports; never megapatch or -Xlint:-deprecation as “done”. Prefer waiting for LOS merges; only port what still warns at freeze. Own patches (005 spoofing, vendor) must stay clean first. Evidence: /srv/rom/artifacts/005-spoofing/20260915-bacon/bacon-log-triage.md. candidate

EOL firmware caveat (for 013)

sunfish is EOL. The project can modify kernel/framework we build, but cannot fabricate new proprietary vendor/modem firmware. Document clearly:

  • security patches we can backport in-tree;
  • old proprietary firmware/baseband/vendor images we cannot fix;
  • do not claim hardware protections unsupported by Pixel 4a.